Beechnut baby food recall 2015
Beech-Nut Nutrition Company Issues a Voluntary Recall of One Lot of Beech-Nut Single Grain Rice Cereal and Also Decides to Exit the Rice Cereal Segment
COMPANY ANNOUNCEMENT
When a company announces a recall, market withdrawal, or safety alert, the FDA posts the company's announcement as a public service. FDA does not endorse either the product or the company.
Read AnnouncementView Product Photos
Summary
- Company Announcement Date:
- FDA Publish Date:
- Product Type:
- Food & Beverages
- Reason for Announcement:
-
Recall Reason Description
Presence of Inorganic Arsenic above Guidance Levels
- Company Name:
- Beech-Nut
- Brand Name:
-
Brand Name(s)
Beech-Nut
- Product Description:
-
Product Description
Stage 1, Single Grain Rice Cereal
Company Announcement
Beech-Nut Nutrition today has issued a voluntary recall of one lot of Beech-Nut Stage 1, Single Grain Rice Cereal. This recall is a result of a routine sampling program by the State of Alaska which found that samples from that production lot of Beech-Nut Stage 1, Single Grain Rice Cereal tested above the guidance level for naturally occurring inorganic arsenic set by the FDA in August 2020, though the rice flour used had been tested and confirmed as being below the FDA guidance level for inorganic arsenic.
FDA has recognized that trace elements such as these are widely present in the environment, including water, soil and food; and has also stated that exposure to elevated levels of naturally occurring inorganic arsenic can pose a health hazard to young children.
The specific Beech-Nut Single Grain Rice item (UPC Code# 52200034705) being recalled has an expiration date of 01MAY2022 and product codes: 103470XXXX and 093470XXXX. The expiration date and product numbers can be found at the bottom of the Beech-Nut Single Rice Cereal canister. These specific product codes were distributed nationally through retail and online.
In addition to issuing the voluntary recall, Beech-Nut has also decided to exit the market for Beech-Nut branded Single Grain Rice Cereal. Beech-Nut is concerned about the ability to consistently obtain rice flour well-below the FDA guidance level and Beech-Nut specifications for naturally occurring inorganic arsenic.
"The safety of infants and children is Beech-Nut's top priority. We are issuing this voluntary recall, because we learned through routine sampling by the State of Alaska that a limited quantity of Beech-Nut Single Grain Rice Cereal products had levels of naturally-occurring inorganic arsenic above the FDA guidance level, even though the rice flour used to produce these products tested below the FDA guidance level for inorganic arsenic," said Jason Jacobs, Vice President, Food Safety and Quality.
No illnesses related to these product codes have been reported to date, and no other production dates or Beech-Nut products are affected by this recall.
Consumers who may have purchased Beech-Nut Rice Cereal with product codes: 103470XXXX and 093470XXXX with expiration of 01MAY2022 should discard the product. They can also go to www.beechnut.com/ricecereal, or call 1-866-272-9417, Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. for further information on obtaining an exchange or refund.
Company Contact Information
- Consumers:
- Beech-Nut
- 1-866-272-9417
- Media:
- [email protected]
Product Photos
More Recalls, Market
Withdrawals, &
Safety Alerts
Baby Food Products Recall 2022: Are There Harmful Chemicals & Toxic Metals In Your Baby’s Food? Gerber, Happy Baby, Beechnut, etc.
Overview
Did you know that 95% of baby food products contain harmful chemicals and toxic metals — and many are from the most popular brands? (1)(2)
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!
These baby foods contain dangerously high levels of arsenic, lead, mercury, and cadmium.
Exposure to these heavy metals can cause permanent damage to your baby’s brain development. It may lead to IQ decrease and antisocial behavior. (3)(4)
Have these contaminated products been recalled? Did the baby food makers solve the problem and compensate the affected consumers?
Read on to get answers to your baby food recall concerns.
Baby Formula Recall & Shortage 2022
Update: May 11, 2022
Baby Formula Shortage 2022
Although prepared in liquid form, infant formula is also baby food.
That’s why the baby formula shortage of 2022 makes parents worried, especially after recent reports from research firm Datasembly showed that the nationwide out-of-stock rate has reached 43%. (5)
According to the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), as many as 75% of babies in the US are likely given formula products by six months of age. (6)
Worried parents and caregivers are having a difficult time finding stocks, especially because formula retailers are also rationing available supplies.
Many areas, such as Texas and West Virginia, temporarily expanded the WIC program (Women, Infants and Children) to include other formula brands. (7)(8)
The baby formula shortage began during the pandemic and was first attributed to supply chain issues. However, the massive recall of Similac products worsened the shortage.
Similac Infant Formula Recall 2022
In February 2022, Abbott Nutrition issued two recall announcements after their products were linked to Cronobacter Sakazakii and Salmonella infection, which led to several hospitalizations and two infant deaths. (9)
The company also received multiple consumer complaints of infants getting sick after taking the formulas.
Infant formula products that are part of the recall: (10)
- First recall: Similac, Alimentum, and EleCare powdered infant formulas
- Second recall: One lot of Similac PM 60/40, with lot number 27032K80 (can) or 27032K800 (case)
Liquid formulas aren’t included in the recalled products.
Ingestion of infant formula contaminated with Cronobacter Sakazakii and Salmonella can lead to meningitis and sepsis. Symptoms can include the following: (9)
- Temperature changes
- Grunting breaths
- Unusual movements
- Irritability
- Poor feeding or no appetite
- Jaundice (yellow skin and whites of the eyes)
Newborns and young babies are more prone to experiencing serious symptoms. Call your healthcare provider if you notice any of these symptoms.
Although the infant deaths were determined to be due to Cronobacter Sakazakii infection, Abbott Nutrition maintains that the strains found in the investigation of the bacterial infections don’t match those in their facility in Sturgis, Michigan, and the recalled products. (10)
Alarming 2021 Government Report Findings
In February 2021, a congressional report by the Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy called out major baby food manufacturers for selling products tainted with dangerous levels of toxic heavy metals. (2)
Which Baby Food Brands Are Toxic?
These name brands were listed:
- Nurture, Inc. (HappyBABY and HappyTOT)
- Beech-Nut Nutrition Company (Beech-Nut)
- Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (Earth’s Best Organic)
- Gerber
- Campbell’s Plum Organics
- Walmart Inc. (Parent’s Choice)
- Sprout Foods, Inc. (Sprout Organic Foods)
Eight months later, the same subcommittee released a second baby food report in September 2021.
This follow-up report found that many of the same brands called out previously were still producing and under-reporting baby products that tested at much higher levels than considered safe.
Is There A Recall On Gerber Baby Food 2021?
What’s more concerning, companies such as Gerber failed to disclose these alarming results to the public and kept these tainted products on the market thereby failing to protect consumers. (2)
Spearheading the subcommittee reports is Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, who released this statement on his official Instagram page:
“My Subcommittee’s investigation has pulled back the curtain on the baby food industry, and each revelation has been more damning than the last.
I’ve released a new report on toxic metals in baby food, including popular brands such as Gerber’s Infant Rice Cereal products containing dangerous levels of inorganic arsenic.
We trust these companies with our babies, and they have failed us.”
Is There A Baby Food Recall 2021?
Parent’s Choice Rice Baby Cereal
- Date Recalled: October 08, 2021
- Reasons For Recall: The products tested above government standards for naturally occurring inorganic arsenic (11)
- Company: Maple Island Inc.
- Return or Refund Processing: Call 1-800-369-1022 or email at [email protected]
Affected products are 8-oz. packages of Parent’s Choice Rice Baby Cereal (UPC number 00681131082907) from these lots: (11)
- Lot 21083 with a best-if-used-by date of June 24, 2022
- Lot 21084 with a best-if-used-by date of June 25, 2022
- Lot 21242 with a best-if-used-by date of November 30, 2022
No illnesses have been reported in this recall and no other Parent’s Choice products have been affected. (11)
Beech-Nut Single Grain Rice Cereal
- Date Recalled: June 8, 2021
- Company Name: Beech-Nut
- Reasons For Recall: High arsenic levels
- Affected Products: UPC Code# 52200034705; Product codes 103470XXXX and 093470XXXX; Expiration date 01 MAY 2022 (12)
- Return or Refund Processing: www.beechnut.com/ricecereal or 1-866-272-9417
Statement from Jason Jacobs, Beech-Nut’s vice president for food safety and quality: (13)
“The safety of infants and children is Beech-Nut‘s top priority. We are issuing this voluntary recall because we learned through routine sampling by the State of Alaska that a limited quantity of Beech-Nut Single Grain Rice Cereal products had levels of naturally-occurring inorganic arsenic above the FDA guidance level, even though the rice flour used to produce these products tested below the FDA guidance level for inorganic arsenic.”
Peppa Pig Chocolate Chip Cookies Gable Box
- Date Recalled: May 20, 2021
- Company Name: Primary Colors Design Corp.
- Reasons For Recall: Undeclared egg content (allergen)
- Affected Products: UPC 84512050159; lot 091820; expiration date 09/18/2021 (14)
- Return or Refund Processing: [email protected] or 419-903-0403
What Baby Food Brands Are Being Recalled?
- Parent’s Choice
- Beech-Nut
- Peppa Pig
There have also been food recalls in 2020 and previous years:
Baby Food Recall 2020
Lidl Lupilu Pouches (UK)
- Date Recalled: February 12, 2020
- Company Name: Lidl
- Reasons For Recall: Possible presence of mold (15)
- Return or Refund Processing: Return to store for a refund
Affected Products (all batches/lots of these Lupilu pouches):
- Apples & Strawberries, Stage 1
- Bananas & Apples, Stage 1
- Banana & Peaches, Stage 1
- Apples, Carrots, & Parsnips, Stage 1
- Butternut Squash, Apples, Carrots & Prunes, Stage 1
- Sweet Potato, Pumpkin, Apples & Blueberries, Stage 1
- Organic Apple, Stage 1
- Banana Yoghurt with Oats & Rice, Stage 2
- Banana, Blueberries, & Rice, Stage 2
- Mango Yoghurt with Oats & Rice, Stage 2
Cow & Gate Baby Food Jars (UK)
- Date Recalled: January 25, 2020
- Company Name: Cow & Gate; Tesco
- Reasons For Recall: Possible tampering of these products in Tesco stores in the UK (United Kingdom). (16)
- Return or Refund Processing: Tesco Customer Services (0800-917-6897) or Cow & Gate (0800-977-8880).
Affected Products (all batches/lots of Cow & Gate 7+ months variants in 200g jars):
- Butternut Squash Chicken & Pasta
- Courgette & Hake Rice
- Creamy Cauliflower Cheese
- Garden Pea & Turkey
- Potato Spinach & Beef
- Potato & Turkey Roast
- Spaghetti Bolognese
- Succulent Pork Casserole
- Tasty Cottage Pie
- Tomato & Courgette Pasta
- Yummy Harvest Chicken
- Apple Crumble
- Banana Crumble
- Peach Apple & Kiwi
- Rice Pudding
Baby Food Recall 2019
Herbal Tea for Infants by Mountain Mel’s
- Date Recalled: August 29, 2019
- Company Name: Mountain Mel’s Essential Goods, LLC
- Reasons For Recall: Possible contamination with Salmonella (bacteria that causes fever, diarrhea, and muscle cramps). (17)
- Return or Refund Processing: [email protected] or 503-564-9135.
Affected Products (all stamped with “best before date: 7/2021”):
- The Milk Lady’s Tea; UPC 7-99632-05658-4 with LOT# ML6271950
- Peaceful Baby Herbal Tea; UPC 7-99632-05656-0 with LOT# PB781950
- Diges-Teas Herbal Tea; UPC 7-99632-05665-2 with LOT# DT7619100
Heinz Turkey Stew 8+ Baby Food (Canada)
- Date Recalled: August 16, 2019
- Company Name: Kraft Heinz Canada
- Reasons For Recall: Possible presence of insects
- Affected Products: UPC 0-572200-6; product code 2021JN04 (18)
- Return or Refund Processing: [email protected] or 1-866-572-3809
Cow & Gate Cheesy Broccoli Bake, Stage 3 (UK)
- Date Recalled: May 13, 2019
- Company Name: Cow & Gate
- Reasons For Recall: May contain small pieces of blue rubber (19)
- Affected Products: Batch code 28122020, best before date: 28 December 2020
- Return or Refund Processing: live chat at www. cgbabyclub.co.uk/contact-us or call 0800-977-4000
Baby Food Recall 2018
Love Child Organics (Canada)
- Date Recalled: May 26, 2018
- Company Name: CGL FDS, Greenspace Brands Inc.
- Reasons For Recall: Packaging defects may allow entry of spoilage microorganisms (20)
- Return or Refund Processing: Return to the store where you got them.
Affected Products (all with best before date code: 2019MA25):
- Vegetarian Chili with Sweet Potato + Kale; UPC 85886000170
- Veggie Casserole with Lentils + Quinoa; UPC 85886000171
- Ratatouille with Lentils + White Beans; UPC 85886000172
- Pumpkin Risotto with Spinach + Chickpeas; UPC 85886000173
- Mango Chicken Stew with Spinach + Quinoa; UPC 85886000174
- Thanksgiving Dinner with Veggies + Turkey; UPC 85886000175
- Hearty Bolognese with Beef + Quinoa; UPC 85886000176
PC Organics Baby Food Recall (Canada)
- Date Recalled: May 26, 2018
- Company Name: CGL FDS, Greenspace Brands Inc.
- Reasons For Recall: Packaging defects may cause spoilage (20)
- Return or Refund Processing: Return to the store where you purchased them.
Affected Products (all strained baby foods with best before date code: 2019MA25):
- Carrots; UPC 060383172800
- Parsnip; UPC 060383172817
- Peas; UPC 060383172824
- Sweet Potatoes; UPC 060383172831
- Vegetables & Turkey; UPC 060383174408
- Fruity Chicken; UPC 060383174415
- Spaghetti Bolognese; UPC 060383193201
- Vegetable & Lentil; UPC 060383193218
- Chicken Casserole; UPC 060383193225
Baby Food Recall 2017
Yummy Spoonfuls Chicken and Vegetable Products
- Date Recalled: June 24, 2017
- Company Name: Overhill Farms, Inc.
- Reasons For Recall: Possible presence of crushed chicken bones (21)
- Return or Refund Processing: (844)-986-6948
Affected Products:
- Chicken & Carrot Bites; with best before dates 02/01/18, 02/09/18, & 4/26/2018.
- Chicken & Sweet Potato Bites; with best before dates 02/01/18 & 02/09/18.
- Chicken & Broccoli Bites; with best before dates 08/30/17, 02/20/18, & 4/10/18.
Fully Cooked Organic Chicken and Vegetable Products
- Date Recalled: June 24, 2017
- Company Name: Overhill Farms, Inc.
- Reasons For Recall: Possible presence of crushed chicken bones (21)
- Return or Refund Processing: (844)-986-6948
Affected Products:
- Chicken & Vegetable Patty; case code 320422 with packaging date 08/30/16.
- Chicken Patties with Carrots and Cauliflower; case code 320460 with packaging date 02/09/17.
- Chicken Patties with Sweet Potatoes, Quinoa, and Peas; case code 320430 with packaging dates 02/09/17 and 04/25/17.
Gerber Cheese Ravioli Pasta Pick-Ups
- Date Recalled: March 08, 2017
- Company Name: Gerber Products Company
- Reasons For Recall: Undeclared egg allergen components on the product label. (22)
- Affected Products: UPC code 159070
- Return or Refund Processing: 1-800-510-7494
PC Organics Baby Food Recall (Canada & US)
- Date Recalled: February 07, 2017
- Company Name: Loblaw Companies Limited
- Reasons For Recall: Manufacturing error may cause the growth of Clostridium botulinum (bacteria that causes food poisoning). (23)
- Return or Refund Processing: Return to the store
Affected Products (all are strained baby foods or puree snacks)
- Apple, Blueberry & Green Pea; UPC 060383062927
- Apple Crisp Muffin flavor; UPC 060383137304
- Apple, Carrot, Apricot & Millet; UPC 06038306996
- Banana, Sweet Potato & Blueberry; UPC 06038305362
- Apple; UPC 060383028404
- Apple, Banana & Blueberry with Yogurt; UPC 06038304491
- Apple, Banana & Strawberry with Yogurt; UPC 06038304488
- Apple Cherry; UPC 06038302843
- Sweet Potato, Apple and Mango; UPC 06038306294
- Peach Maple Cobbler Flavour; UPC 060383137328
- Banana Apple & Carrot; UPC 06038305363
- Pumpkin, Apple, Peach & Buckwheat; 06038306995
- Prune, Apple, Butternut Squash & Quinoa; UPC 06038306994
- Pear; UPC 06038302842
- Mango, Apple, Carrot & Peach; UPC 06038305369
- Blackberry Cobbler Flavour; UPC 060383137311
- Banana & Kiwi; UPC 060383028466
- Mango; UPC 060383028411
- Banana & Raspberry; UPC 060383054809
- Banana, Apple, Apricot & Rice; UPC 06038305368
- Banana Bread Flavour; UPC 060383135898
- Pear, Apple and Broccoli; UPC 06038306291
- Sweet Potato, Banana & Apricot; UPC 06038305366
- Tropical Twist Smoothie with Greek Yogurt; UPC 060383154301
- Banana, Mango & Apple with Yogurt; UPC 06038304489
- Orange Twist Smoothie with Greek Yogurt; UPC 060383154318
- Prunes; UPC 060383169633
- Apple, Banana & Strawberry with Yogurt; UPC 060383184278
- Sweet Potato, Apple and Mango; UPC 060383184292
- Banana Apple & Carrot; UPC 060383184285
- Mango; UPC 060383184308
- Pear, Apple, and Broccoli; UPC 060383184261
Baby Food Recall 2016
H-E-B Baby Food Recall
- Date Recalled: November 18, 2016
- Company Name: H-E-B
- Reasons For Recall: Possible contamination with rubber (24)
- Return or Refund Processing: 1‑855‑432‑4438
Affected Products:
- Banana Passion Fruit; UPC 4122081488
- Banana Pineapple Mango; UPC 4122084761
- Green Beans; UPC 4122005670
- Banana Apple; UPC 4122000208
- Green Beans Corn; UPC 4122005671
- Banana; UPC 4122083207
- Squash, Sweet Corn, & Tomato; UPC 4122066357
- Pear, Carrot, & Blueberry; UPC 4122005673
- Peas & Carrots; UPC 4122005685
- Vegetable Chickpea Mix; UPC 4122005668
- Banana, Carrot, & Mango; UPC 4122025540
- Apple, Carrot, Pumpkin, & Zucchini; UPC 4122054253
- Sweet Potato, Pumpkin, & Zucchini; UPC 4122066026
- Peas; UPC4122005684
- Apple; UPC 4122081487
- Pear Pineapple, & Zucchini; UPC 4122018455
- Pear, Peas, & Zucchini; UPC 4122079172
- Sweet Potato; UPC 412200568
Gerber Organic 2ND FOODS Pouches
- Date Recalled: March 24, 2016
- Company Name:
- Reasons For Recall: Packaging defects may result in product spoilage during transport and handling. (25)
- Return or Refund Processing: 1-800-706-0556
Affected Products:
- Pears, Carrots & Peas; best before dates July 12, 2016 (batch code 51945335XX), and July 13, 2016 (batch code 51955335XX)
- Carrots, Apples & Mangoes; best before dates July 13, 2016 (batch code 51955335XX), and July 14, 2016 (batch code 51965335XX)
GoGo Squeez Applesauce Pouches
- Date Recalled: March 2016
- Company Name: Materne North America Corp.
- Reasons For Recall: Possible contamination from food product residues (26)
- Affected Products: Pouches with best before dates 12/4/15 to 3/4/17 and codes US01XXXX to US08XXXX.
- Return or Refund Processing: 1-844-275-5841 or visit voucher. gogosqueez.com
Baby Food Recall 2015
Beech-Nut CLASSICS Sweet Potato & Chicken
- Date Recalled: April 14, 2015
- Company Name: Beech-Nut Nutrition, Amsterdam, New York
- Reasons For Recall: Possible contamination with glass (27)
- Affected Products: Product numbers 12395750815 through 12395750821; product expiry date DEC 2016
- Return or Refund Processing: Return to store or call (518) 839-0300
Congressional Report On Toxic Baby Foods
The US Congress’ Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy requested test results from these seven popular baby food companies following reports alleging high levels of toxic heavy metals: (2)
- Nurture, Inc. (HappyBABY)
- Beech-Nut Nutrition Company (Beech-Nut)
- Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (Earth’s Best Organic)
- Gerber
- Campbell Soup Company (Plum Organics)
- Walmart Inc. (Parent’s Choice)
- Sprout Foods, Inc. (Sprout Organic Foods)
According to the Congressional Report, Campbell, Walmart, and Sprout refused to cooperate.
So, the Subcommittee expressed concern that these baby food companies might be hiding higher levels of toxic elements in their products.
Nurture, Hain, Beech-Nut, and Gerber provided the House Subcommittee with their test results and internal product testing policies.
But the Subcommittee was alarmed after these baby food manufacturers reported test results of products containing very high levels of heavy metals:
- Inorganic arsenic
- Lead
- Cadmium
- Mercury
Their test results showed that the products had heavy metals several times the maximum allowable levels set by the FDA (U. S. Food and Drug Administration).
FDA maximum limits in ppb (parts per billion) for bottled water: (28)
- 10 ppb inorganic arsenic
- 5 ppb lead
- 5 ppb cadmium
FDA maximum limits for infant rice cereal:
- 100 ppb inorganic arsenic
EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) maximum limit for drinking water (may also apply to food):
- 2 ppb mercury
Instead of complying with regulators, these baby food manufacturers created internal standards that allowed dangerously high levels of toxic heavy metals: (2)
- Nurture (arsenic): 115 ppb
- Beech-Nut (arsenic): 3,000 ppb
- Beech-Nut (cadmium): 3,000 ppb
- Beech-Nut (lead): 5,000 ppb
- Hain (arsenic): 200 ppb
- Hain (lead): 200 ppb
- Hain (cadmium): 200 ppb
Nurture, Inc.
(HappyBABY)Inorganic Arsenic:
- Up to 180 ppb for Apple & Broccoli Puffs
- Up to 160 for Banana & Pumpkin Puffs
- Up to 160 for Strawberry & Beet Puffs
- Up to 100 ppb for more than 25% of all Nurture products
Lead:
- Up to 641 ppb for Blueberry Purple Carrot
- Up to 560 ppb for Multi-Grain Cereal Canister
- Up to 10 ppb for nearly 20% of all Nurture vegetable and rice products
Cadmium:
- Up to 49 ppb in Multi-Grain Cereal Canister
- Up to 36 ppb in Strawberry Raspberry
- Up to 5 ppb in 65% of baby products
Mercury:
- Up to 10 ppb in Brown Rice Cereal Canister
- Up to 9.8 ppb in Banana Sweet Potato
Findings/Response:
- Nurture is the only baby food manufacturer that regularly tests finished products for heavy metals. The others only test ingredients.
In response to the investigation, Nurture told the Subcommittee: (2)
“Our heavy metal testing is performed as part of our monitoring program and not as a condition of product release. All of the products that were tested were sold into commerce.”
Beech-Nut Nutrition Company (Beech-Nut)
Inorganic Arsenic:
- Up to 913.4 ppb in ingredients.
- Over 300 ppb in additives used in their products
Lead:
- Up to 886.9 ppb in ingredients.
Cadmium:
- Up to 344.55 ppb in its ingredients.
Mercury:
- No test for mercury.
Actions Taken:
- Beech-Nut set very high internal maximum levels for heavy metals. So, all their ingredients passed their internal standards but actually failed government regulations and federal standards. (2)
Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (Earth’s Best Organic)
Inorganic Arsenic:
- Up to 129 ppb in baby products
- Up to 309 ppb in ingredients
- The company only tested their ingredients, not the finished products.
Lead:
- Up to 352 ppb in ingredients (vitamin premix)
Cadmium:
- Up to 260 ppb in ingredients
Mercury:
- No test for mercury
Actions Taken:
- Hain admits to the Subcommittee that they’re only using “theoretical calculations” on their test results. (2)
Gerber
Inorganic Arsenic:
- Up to 90 ppb in tested ingredients from 67 batches of rice flour
Lead:
- Up to 48 ppb in ingredients (sweet potatoes)
Cadmium:
- Over 5 ppb in 75% of carrot ingredients
- Up to 87 ppb in some carrot batches
- The company doesn’t test the other ingredients for this heavy metal.
Mercury:
- No test for mercury.
Campbell Soup Company (Plum Organics)
Inorganic Arsenic:
- Up to 3.1 ppb
Lead:
- Up to 5.6 ppb
Cadmium:
- Up to 2.3 ppb
Mercury:
- Less than 0.142 ppb
Actions Taken:
- Results are for Just Sweet Potato Organic Baby Food.
- The results above are from the Healthy Babies Bright Futures report. (1)
- Campbell refused to submit actual test results or standards/criteria they used for the tests. Instead, the company provided a report that each product “meets criteria” to the Subcommittee.
Walmart Inc. (Parent’s Choice)
Inorganic Arsenic:
- Up to 56. 1 ppb in (A) Little Hearts Strawberry Yogurt Cereal Snack
- Up to 108 ppb in (B) Organic Strawberry Rice Rusks
Lead:
- Up to 5.2 ppb in (A)
- Up to 26.9 ppb in (B)
Cadmium:
- Up to 26.1 ppb in (A)
- Up to 2.4 ppb in (B)
Mercury:
- Up to 0.941 ppb in (A)
- Up to 2.05 ppb in (B)
Actions Taken:
- The above results are from the Healthy Babies Bright Futures report. (1)
- Walmart didn’t submit test results to the Subcommittee.
Sprout Foods, Inc. (Sprout Organic Foods)
Inorganic Arsenic:
- Up to 107 ppb
Lead:
- Up to 39.3 ppb
Cadmium:
- Up to 41. 5 ppb
Mercury:
- Up to 1.31 ppb
Actions Taken:
- Results are for Organic Quinoa Puffs Baby Cereal Snack – Apple Kale.
- The results listed are from the Healthy Babies Bright Futures report. (1)
- Sprout never responded to the Subcommittee.
What Parents Should Know
- Healthy Babies Bright Futures and other organizations call for baby food manufacturers to set a goal of zero levels of inorganic arsenic in all baby foods.
- Consumer Reports suggest changing maximum inorganic arsenic levels to 3 ppb in baby foods. That’s lower than the current FDA and EPA limit of 10 ppb.
- Consumer Reports also wants to lower cadmium limits to 1 ppb in fruit juices.
What Parents Can Do
The AAP (American Academy of Pediatrics) advises offering your baby a variety of foods to reduce the levels of lead and other toxic heavy metals in their diet. (30)
Healthy Babies Bright Futures and Consumer Reports recommend the following healthier food options for young children: (1)
High-Risk Food: Snacks (including puffs) made from rice flour
Heavy Metals: Arsenic, lead, and cadmium
Healthier Alternatives:
- Rice-free packaged snacks
- Multi-grain snacks
- Apples
- Applesauce (unsweetened)
- Bananas
- Barley with diced vegetables
- Beans
- Cheese
- Grapes
- Hard-boiled eggs
- Peaches
- Yogurt
High-Risk Food: Rice rusks and teething biscuits
Heavy Metals: Arsenic, lead, and cadmium
Healthier Alternatives:
- Frozen banana
- Peeled and chilled cucumber
High-Risk Food: Single grain rice cereal
Heavy Metals: Arsenic
Healthier Alternatives:
- Non-rice and multi-grain cereals
- Oatmeal
- Corn
- Barley
- Quinoa
High-Risk Food: Fruit juices from apple, pear, grape, and others
Heavy Metals: Lead and arsenic
Healthier Alternatives:
- Tap water
- Whole or pureed fruits (applesauce)
High-Risk Food: Carrots and sweet potatoes
Heavy metals: Lead and cadmium
Healthier Alternatives:
- These vegetables are important in your baby’s diet.
- They’re rich in vitamin A and other nutrients.
- Limit your baby’s intake of these vegetables.
- Serve these vegetables with others so they won’t be taken in excess.
Baby Food Safety Act Of 2021
US PIRG (Public Interest Research Group) and Consumer Reports call on Congress to pass the Baby Food Safety Act of 2021. (29)
This law will require the FDA to adopt stricter limits for baby foods.
It will also require baby food manufacturers to test and disclose test results to parents and regulators.
Healthier Baby Food Brands
The following baby food brands are 100% safe, organic, and non-toxic:
- Once Upon A Farm
- Serenity Kids
- Little Journey Organics
- Yumi (subscription-based)
- Little Spoon (subscription-based)
REFERENCES
(1) http://www. healthybabyfood.org/sites/healthybabyfoods.org/files/2019-10/BabyFoodReport_FULLREPORT_ENGLISH_R5b.pdf
(2) https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/2021-02-04%20ECP%20Baby%20Food%20Staff%20Report.pdf
(3) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23570911/
(4) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4418502/
(5) https://www.cbsnews.com/news/baby-formula-shortage-2022-states/
(6) https://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/pdf/2020-Breastfeeding-Report-Card-H.pdf
(7) https://texaswic.org/about-wic/special-wic-food-updates
(8) https://dhhr.wv.gov/News/2022/Pages/WIC-Introduces-Additional-Flexibilities-Amid-Powdered-Infant-Formula-Recall.aspx
(9) https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-warns-consumers-not-use-certain-powdered-infant-formula-produced-abbott-nutritions-facility
(10) https://www.similacrecall.com/us/en/home.html
(11) https://www.fda.gov/safety/recalls-market-withdrawals-safety-alerts/maple-island-inc-issues-voluntary-recall-three-lots-parents-choice-rice-baby-cereal
(12) https://www. fda.gov/safety/recalls-market-withdrawals-safety-alerts/beech-nut-nutrition-company-issues-voluntary-recall-one-lot-beech-nut-single-grain-rice-cereal-and
(13) https://www.goodmorningamerica.com/wellness/story/beech-nut-stop-selling-specific-baby-rice-cereal-78196121
(14) https://www.fda.gov/safety/recalls-market-withdrawals-safety-alerts/primary-colors-design-corp-issues-allergy-alert-undeclared-egg-peppa-pig-chocolate-chip-cookies
(15) https://www.food.gov.uk/news-alerts/alert/fsa-prin-08-2020
(16) https://www.food.gov.uk/news-alerts/alert/fsa-prin-03-2020
(17) https://www.fda.gov/safety/recalls-market-withdrawals-safety-alerts/mountain-mels-essential-goods-llc-recalls-milk-ladys-herbal-tea-blend-peaceful-baby-herbal-tea-blend
(18) https://inspection.canada.ca/food-recall-warnings-and-allergy-alerts/2019-08-16/eng/1566012117302/1566012119453?print=1#r08
(19) https://www.food.gov.uk/news-alerts/alert/fsa-prin-20-2019
(20) https://inspection. canada.ca/food-recall-warnings-and-allergy-alerts/2018-05-26/eng/1527371146055/1527371148679
(21) https://www.fsis.usda.gov/recalls-alerts/overhill-farms-inc.-recalls-chicken-products-due-possible-foreign-matter
(22) https://www.fda.gov/safety/recalls-market-withdrawals-safety-alerts/gerber-issues-allergy-alert-clarify-egg-labeling-cheese-ravioli-pasta-pick-upsr
(23) https://www.fda.gov/safety/recalls-market-withdrawals-safety-alerts/fda-posting-canadian-food-inspection-agencys-recall-notice-alert-us-consumers-who-may-have-purchased
(24) https://www.heb.com/static-page/article-template/heb-baby-food-recall-nov-2016
(25) http://news.gerber.com/news/gerber-is-voluntarily-recalling-two-batches-of-gerberR-organic-2nd-foodsR-pouches
(26) https://www.gogosqueez.com/recall/
(27) https://www.fsis.usda.gov/recalls-alerts/beech-nut-nutrition-recalls-baby-food-product-due-possible-foreign-matter
(28) https://www.fda.gov/food/metals-and-your-food/arsenic-food-and-dietary-supplements
(29) https://www. usatoday.com/story/money/shopping/2021/06/09/beech-nut-baby-food-recall-2021-rice-cereal-arsenic/7621243002/
(30) https://www.aappublications.org/news/2021/05/01/parentplus-babyfoodmetal050121
Hygienic assessment of the nutrition of children from 7 to 10 years old living in boarding schools at educational institutions of the Nenets Autonomous Okrug
Nutrition is one of the most powerful constantly acting on the body and, at the same time, amenable to rational regulation of factors. The food that children receive should cover not only the energy costs of the body in the process of life, but also ensure the proper growth and development of the child's body. In this regard, any violations in the nutrition of children - both quantitative and, especially, qualitative - are fraught with negative consequences for the health of the child [1,2].
The main components of rational nutrition are an adequate ratio of essential nutrients, the adequacy and nutritional value, taking into account age-related characteristics when normalizing the need for basic nutrients and energy, as well as the correct distribution of food by meals and the distribution of its meals throughout the day, united by the concept of " diet” [3].
Keywords: rational nutrition, nutritional value, micronutrients.
In order to assess the organization of nutrition for children living in boarding schools, the diet of pupils from 12 boarding schools at general educational institutions of the Zapolyarny District of the Nenets Autonomous Okrug was analyzed.
In the course of the study, menu layouts of boarding schools at general educational institutions of the Nenets Autonomous Okrug were analyzed for one day, week, month, with the calculation of the content of the main food ingredients, minerals, vitamins in the diets, the energy value of the daily volume of food, with an analysis of the variety of dishes and products.
When studying the average daily set of food products, including those used for preparing meals and drinks, for students and residents of boarding schools at general educational institutions, from 7 to 10 years old, it was revealed that practically not a single product was contained in the diet of children in quantities complying with hygienic recommendations. Thus, a significant deficiency in the diet of pupils of both milk and dairy products was revealed (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1. The content of dairy products in the diet of boarding school students aged 7–10 years (% in relation to the recommended standards)
Note: CMP - sour-milk products, IU - boarding schools
It follows from the diagram data that the most pronounced shortage in the diets of children brought up in boarding schools was noted for such products as cottage cheese (the deficit was 76.51%) and sour cream (the deficit was 54.40%). Consequently, children do not receive enough animal protein, as well as calcium contained in dairy products.
Animal protein deficiency in the diet of boarding school children is aggravated by the insufficient content of meat, fish and poultry in it, as evidenced by the data presented in Figure 2.
Fig. 2 The content of meat products and fish in the diet of boarding school students aged 7-10 years (% in relation to the recommended standards)
Note: CI - sausages; IU - boarding schools
The diagram shows that if the shortage of meat and sausages was small (10. 91% and 10.48% respectively), then the content of poultry in the diet did not even reach half of the recommended norm, and the content of fish was slightly more than a third of the norm. Given that the processes of growth and development in this age period are quite intense, such a pronounced deficiency of animal protein cannot but affect them.
The content of fruits and vegetables in the diet of boarding school children also did not meet the standards (Table 1).
When analyzing the data in the table, it is noteworthy that the content of vegetables and fruits in the diet of boarding school students varied from 53.08% (vegetables, herbs) to 69.39% (dried fruits). Of course, such content cannot be considered sufficient and appropriate to the needs of children of this age.
Table 1
The content of vegetables and fruits in the diet of preschool children aged 7–10 years (% in relation to the recommended standards)
Product name | Norm (net, gr) | Diet content (net, g) | Deficit (%) |
Potatoes | 400. 0 | 231.95±2.18 | 42.01% |
Vegetables, herbs | 470.0 | 249.46±3.04 | 46.92% |
Fresh fruits (fruits) | 250.0 | 173.49±2.96 | 30.61% |
Dry fruits (fruits) | 15. 0 | 9.66±1.01 | 35.60% |
It should also be noted that children did not receive enough fruit juices - their content in the diet was only 78.35% of the norm. As for fortified drinks, they were completely absent from the diet of boarding schools. In general, this creates a threat of hypovitaminosis development in this contingent of children.
The study of the content of bread, pasta and cereals in the diet also revealed a deficiency (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3. The content of bread, cereals, pasta and flour in the diet of boarding school students aged 7-10 years (% in relation to the recommended standards)
Note: MI - pasta; IU - boarding schools
From the data presented in the diagram, it follows that only the content of cereals, legumes and pasta in the diet met the standards. At the same time, children did not receive enough bread (both rye and wheat), and the content of flour in their diet reached only 15.43% of the norm. Attention is drawn to the complete absence of potato flour (starch) in the diet of boarding school students.
Insufficient content of carbohydrates in the diet of children, due to a shortage of bread and flour, is aggravated by a decrease in the content of sugar in the diet of boarding school students (the deficit was 36.28%) and confectionery (deficit 46.52%).
The diet of children of this age group was also deficient in terms of oil content. Moreover, if the deficit of vegetable oil was small (only 8.78%), then the deficit of butter reached 39.26%, i.e. its content in the diet was actually only 2/3 of the recommended one.
As for the content of the analyzed group of drinks in the diet of children, it also did not meet the standards (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4. The content of drinks in the diet of boarding schools aged 7-10 years (% in relation to the recommended standards)
Note: IU - boarding schools
coffee drink was completely absent from their diet. Accordingly, their main drink was tea, the content of which in their diet significantly exceeded the norm.
Children also received less yeast and salt — their deficiency was 79.0% and 37.50%, respectively.
Summarizing the above, it should be emphasized once again that the diet of boarding school students did not meet the recommended standards for almost any product, which is fraught with the development of serious alimentary-dependent diseases and conditions.
When studying the nutritional value of the diet of boarding school students aged 7–10 years, it was found that they have a deficiency of proteins and carbohydrates with an almost normal fat content (Table 2). The energy value of the diets of this group of children was only 89.43% of the norm.
Table 2
Characteristics of the total nutritional value of diets for children aged 7–10 years in boarding schools of the Zapolyarny District, M ± m
Index | Standard | Actual content | % of norm |
Proteins: total, g | 77 | 64. 87±2.04 | 84.25 |
including animal origin | 46 | 34.19±1.36 | 74.33 |
Fats: total, g | 79 | 72.74±2.11 | 92.08 |
Carbohydrates, g | 335 | 291. 84±2.31 | 87.12 |
Energy value, kcal | 2350 | 2101.60±4.06 | 89.43 |
When analyzing the data in the table, attention is drawn to a pronounced deficiency of animal proteins, which is quite natural, given the identified deficit in the diet of boarding school students of such sources of animal protein as meat, poultry, fish, sausages, milk and dairy products. The carbohydrate deficiency is also easily explained, since the diet of children in this age group was completely insufficient in the content of potatoes, vegetables and fruits, as well as sugar, confectionery, bread, flour and the complete absence of starch.
The study of the nutritional value of the diets of boarding school pupils aged 7–10 years by meals allowed us to establish inconsistencies with existing standards (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5 The ratio of nutritional value between meals of the diet of boarding school pupils aged 7–10 years
When analyzing the diagram data, it is noteworthy that the number of meals in boarding schools corresponded to the recommended one. However, the ratio of energy value between individual meals was disturbed. In particular, the calorie content of lunches and dinners was exceeded, while the energy value of breakfasts and afternoon tea was below the norm.
When assessing the diversity of diets of boarding school pupils aged 7–10 years, it was found that in almost all cases this indicator corresponded to the norms. The exception was 1 boarding school, where fish was included in the diet once a week, or even less often, and fresh fruits (berries) and (or) vegetables, herbs and dishes prepared from them were present in the diet 5–6 times a week, which does not correspond norms developed for boarding school students.
When evaluating the methods of culinary processing, it was found that in half of the analyzed boarding schools for 4 weeks there was a repetition of dishes.
The study of the content of vitamins and microelements in the diet of boarding school children aged 7–10 years revealed their deficiency (Table 3).
Table 3
Content in the diet of boarding school children aged 7–10 years, some vitamins and trace elements, M ± m
Designation | Standard | Actual content | Deficit % |
Vitamin C, mg | 60. 0 | 51.85±1.04 | 13.58 |
Vitamin B 1 mg | 1.2 | 0.98±0.05 | 18.33 |
Vitamin B 6 mg | 1.6 | 1.28±0.04 | 20.0 |
Vitamin D, mcg | 2. 5 | 2.44±0.09 | 2.4 |
Calcium, mg | 1100.0 | 979.35±4.19 | 10.97 |
Iron mg | 12.0 | 10.33±0.71 | 13.92 |
From the data in the table it follows that the content of any of the studied micronutrients in the diet did not meet the standards. Vitamin D deficiency was the least pronounced, while vitamin B deficiency was the greatest.
Thus, the analysis of the diet of the pupils of the boarding schools of the "Zapolyarny District" of the Nenets Autonomous Okrug made it possible to identify deviations from the recommended norms in almost all studied parameters. It should be emphasized that the violations were especially pronounced in the diet of children aged 7–10 years. Thus, it was noted that the average daily set of products used to prepare meals and drinks for children of this age group does not correspond to the norm in almost none of the analyzed items (with the exception of cereals, legumes and pasta). Moreover, some products from this set were completely absent in the diet of children aged 7–10 years old, such as potato flour (starch), coffee drink, and fortified drinks. These disorders also affected the total nutritional value of the diet of children of this age - there was a deficiency of protein (mainly of animal origin) and carbohydrates, as well as the overall energy value of the diet. The distribution of calories between meals was also carried out with violations. The children's diet was not varied enough and not all products were included in it with the recommended frequency. In addition, there was a deficiency of vitamins and trace elements.
Such an imbalance between the main nutrients, of course, negatively affects the metabolic processes of the child, especially since in this age period they are in the process of restructuring due to the onset of puberty.
Literature:
1. Aleksanyan, I. Yu. Analysis of systemic relationships between the energy value of the product and food energy consumed by man, taking into account the influence of variable factors / I. Yu. Aleksanyan, A. Kh. Nugmanov, N. P. Zolina // Bulletin of ASTU. Series Management, Computer Engineering and Informatics. — 2009. - No. 2. - S. 114-118.
2. Anisimova, A. V. Modern problems of the formation of the health of children and adolescents / A. V. Anisimova, N. K. Perevoshchikova // Mother and child in Kuzbass. - 2013. - No. 2 (53). — P. 8–14
3. Baranov, A. A. Tasks of pediatric science in protecting children's health / A. A. Baranov // Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences. - 2003. - No. 8. - S. 3-6.
Basic terms (automatically generated) : diet of boarding school pupils, children's diet, content, age, norm, deficiency, animal protein, product, age group, animal origin.
Abbott to extend infant formula recall following death of another baby
www.adv.rbc.ru
www.adv.rbc.ru
Investments
TV channel
Pro
Investments
Events
RBC+
New economy
Trends
Real estate
Sport
Style
National projects
City
Crypto
Debating Club
Research
Credit ratings
Franchises
Newspaper
Special projects St. Petersburg
Conferences St. Petersburg
Special projects
Checking counterparties
RBC Library
Podcasts
ESG index
Politics
Economy
Business
Technology and media
Finance
RBC CompanyRBC Life
www.adv.rbc.ru
Live
Video playback error. Please update your browser.
www.adv.rbc.ru
Photo: Shutterstock
US company Abbott will voluntarily recall one batch of Similac PM 60/40 formulas following the death of another infant. This was said in a statement.
This case is being investigated, the cause of the baby's death is being investigated, the company said.
On February 17, Abbott began a voluntary recall of powder formulas, including Similac, Alimentum and EleCare, manufactured in Sturgis, Michigan. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) launched an investigation, during which it found signs of bacteria (Salmonella and Cronobacter sakazakii) in these products.
Follow the news of companies in the telegram channel "Catalog of RBC Investments"
Author
Darina Artamonova
Growth leaders
Fall leaders
Currencies
Commodities
Indices
Exchange rates of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation
+7.02% $17.37 Buy Novavax NVAX+6. 35% HKD12.72 Buy China Life Insurance Company Limited 2628
+5.36% 90.4 Buy LiAuto 2015
+5.35% $31. 5 Buy JOYY YY
+5.32% HKD3.17 Buy Country Garden HOLDINGS CO 2007
-11.44% $14.4 Buy asana ASAN
-9. 87% $12.87 Buy AppLovin APP
-9.08% $13.21 Buy UiPath PATH
-8.3% $18 Buy Coupang CPNG
-7. 81% $38.81 Buy wayfair W
+1.07% ₽63,020 Buy USD/RUB
+0.82% ₽9,003 Buy CNY/RUB
+0. 1% ₽66,065 Buy EUR/RUB
-0.54% $1,050 Buy EUR/USD
— — Buy CHF/RUB
— — Buy GBP/RUB
-0. 45% $22.14 Silver -0.56% $1,761.3 GOLD -0.84% $1,014.7 Platinum -1.69% $87.51 BRENT
+1. 33% 2209.36 IMOEX +0.38% 694.75 Index SPB100 +0.08% 819.35 IFX-Cbonds -1.41% 1,098.94 RTSI
+1.68% ₽8.931 CNY
+0.